<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing Blog &#187; cybersquatting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/tag/cybersquatting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Read from the Dream Systems Media online marketing blog covering topics related to SEO and internet business blog for ecommerce businesses and small business owners and marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LinkedIn called out for &#8220;turning a blind eye&#8221; to fake celeb profiles</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/linkedin-called-out-for-turning-a-blind-eye-to-fake-celeb-profiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/linkedin-called-out-for-turning-a-blind-eye-to-fake-celeb-profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Mink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David Mink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Trend Micro blog writes that their are numerous fake celeb profiles on LinkedIn which contain links to malware. Bogus profiles of Beyonce Knowles, Kate Hudson, Salma Hayek, and others contain &#8220;tempting&#8221; links to see these stars naked. Once a user clicks on the link &#8220;he will end up on different malicious Web sites trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://blog.trendmicro.com/bogus-linkedin-profiles-harbor-malicious-content/" target="_blank">Trend Micro</a> blog writes that their are numerous fake celeb profiles on LinkedIn which contain links to malware.  Bogus profiles of Beyonce Knowles, Kate Hudson, Salma Hayek, and others contain &#8220;tempting&#8221; links to see these stars naked.  Once a user clicks on the link &#8220;he will end up on different malicious Web sites trying the classical social-engineering tricks of either the &#8216;missing video codec&#8217; or of showing a fake AV scan and telling the user (that) his computer was infected with malware and offering a &#8216;free&#8217; AV scanner software, which in fact is the real threat,&#8221; says the McAfee blog. See the following screen shot:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/beyoncelinkedin2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-617" title="beyoncelinkedin2" src="http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/beyoncelinkedin2.png" alt="" width="500" height="335" /></a></p>
<p>It appears that LinkedIn has been working to take down most of these bogus profiles since it was called out by Trend Micro on Monday (1/5/09). (If you go Google &#8220;Salma Hayek LinkedIn&#8221; you will see that the page did exist but is no longer available.) Good move as this kind of activity by spammers, malware authors, and other cybercriminals raises many legal issues including <a title="cybersquatting" href="http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/i-hate-cybersquatters-and-you-should-too/" target="_blank">social media cybersquatting </a>and possible defamation and trademark claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/linkedin-called-out-for-turning-a-blind-eye-to-fake-celeb-profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I hate cybersquatters and you should too!</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/i-hate-cybersquatters-and-you-should-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/i-hate-cybersquatters-and-you-should-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Mink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David Mink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersquatters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersquatting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cybersquatting (don&#8217;t you just love that word?) is defined by Wikipedia as: Cybersquatting (also known as domain squatting), according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybersquatting (don&#8217;t you just love that word?) is defined by Wikipedia as:<a href="http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/cybersquatter.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-575" title="cybersquatter" src="http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/cybersquatter-276x300.jpg" alt="" width="276" height="300" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Cybersquatting</strong> (also known as <strong>domain squatting</strong>), according to the United States federal law known as the <a title="Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticybersquatting_Consumer_Protection_Act">Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act</a>, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with <a title="Bad faith" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith">bad faith</a> intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price.</p></blockquote>
<p>Cybersquatting costs legitimate businesses untold amounts of money. It is about time one of us cost them some money!</p>
<p><strong>Verizon just won over $33 million dollars in a cybersquatting lawsuit!</strong></p>
<p>Verizon just struck a big blow for legitimate trademark and business owners everywhere when they won a record $33.15 million judgment against Internet domain registrar OnlineNIC for cybersquatting.  That is A LOT of cash!</p>
<p>What did Online NIC do to deserve a judgment of this size? <strong>OnlineNIC had registered at least 663 domain names that were either identical to, or confusingly similar to, Verizon (NYSE: VZ) trademarks</strong>, like  &#8220;Varizon.com&#8221; and &#8220;verizoncellphonecompany.com.&#8221;  Online NIC&#8217;s reason for registering these names was to make money from all of the typo domain name entries.  There are a lot of bad spellers and mistake prone typists out there.  You can imagine the number of individuals who would make  a simple mistake like misspelling Verizon.com as Varizon.com and accidentally land on a page owned by Online NIC.  Many of these same individuals will then click on a Google Ad (which the real Verizon.com is paying for) and be re-directed to the intended site.</p>
<p><strong>This domain name problem is now morphing into a social media problem. </strong> Just ask Graywolf -</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://twitter.com/graywolf" target="_blank">@graywolf</a> Man spammers using my name to push products on Twitter very very lame</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/graywolf" target="_blank">@graywolf </a>All this talk of Twitter going mainstream is BS till they get a handle on spammers and fake profile squatters</p></blockquote>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the law will evolve as it takes on the social media applications of cybersquatting.  To be frank, <strong>I cannot wait to see the first landmark case involving cybersquatting and social media! </strong></p>
<p><strong>In the meantime, Kudos to Verizon for doing their part in helping to curb all of the lame-o cybersquatters!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dreamsystemsmedia.com/blog/index.php/i-hate-cybersquatters-and-you-should-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

